RfA AnalysisRfA AnalysisThis tool identifies duplicate voters in a Request for adminship on the English Wikipedia. This tool can also analyze Requests for bureaucratship pages. Voters for Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/RockMagnetistRockMagnetist's RfA (98/3/1, 97.03%); End date: to fall victim to WP:FRINGE|fringe editing, NPOV violations and other severe conflicts, and one of the main reasons why is that there has always been a lack of expert knowledge in that area. As RockMagnetist's edits in that area are never controversial, and he has a careful approach to diplomacy and consensus as shown by the links above (there are many dozens more), consider this question. Do you trust him with the tools? I know nearly all of you will agree with me. User:Secret|Secret User talk:Secret|account 03:31, 9 March 2013Found 0 duplicate votes (highlighted in red). Votes the tool is unsure about are italicized. Support
Oppose
Neutral
Analyze |
NavigationStable tools
Notice: Use of undefined constant NUBIO - assumed 'NUBIO' in /home/tparis/public_html/common/footer.php on line 89 |